<?xml version="1.0"?>
<html>
<head/>
<body>
Sorry I was not up to the point, I am talking of current implementation of Aerogear scaffold of Forge.
<br/>
<br/>
The question is: should Aerogear scaffold continue with Jackson or migrate to Errai?
<br/>
<br/>
Thomas
<br/>
<br/>
----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
<br/>
Von: "Luca Masini"
<luca.masini.mailing.list gmail.com="gmail.com">
<br/>
Erhalten: 19.12.2012 13:03
<br/>
An: "forge-dev List"
<forge-dev lists.jboss.org="lists.jboss.org">
<br/>
<blockquote>
<!--?xml version="1.0"?-->
<br/>
Hi Thomas, I didn't understand very well the question in your poll.
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>Anyway when you talk about the marshalling, do you mean an annotation that know how to manage how to serialize persistent collection ?? </div>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
<div>In a way, are you talking about the problem that frameworks like Gilead try to solve ??</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br/>
<br/>
<div class="gmail_quote">
2012/12/18 Thomas Frühbeck
<span dir="ltr">
<
<a href="http://javascript:parent.fastEmail('fruehbeck@aon.at');" mce_href="javascript:parent.fastEmail('fruehbeck@aon.at');" target="_blank" mce="mce" target="_blank">fruehbeck@aon.at</a>
>
</span>
<br/>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; padding-left: 1ex">
Hi,
<br/>
<br/>
during experiments extending a generated aerogear application I found that
<br/>
- the current integration of JSON via Jackson is kinda creative hack
<br/>
- not easily portable to recent releases of Jackson (see above)
<br/>
- does not make use of annotation driven UI/ser/deserializ. processing
<br/>
<br/>
During my investigations on upgrade possibilities to modern Jackson I realized, that Errai is a very powerful and complete framework well worth being featured
<br/>
in Forge's scaffold.
<br/>
As I am not really deep into Jackson/JSON/Rest yet I would like to ask for your opinion on this.
<br/>
<br/>
Another question regarding use of annotations in a scaffold:
<br/>
Especially regarding modern Errai/Jackson annotations are an easy means to control the UI / (De-)Serialization, e.g. when working with entities, I think it is
<br/>
necessary to use persistence-based entity instantiation before deserialization, to avoid loss of data if an incomplete entity is desrialized and persisted by
<br/>
merge().
<br/>
<br/>
Do you think it acceptable to actively insert annotations into entity code - possibly by a scaffold command like "scaffold applyAnnotations"?
<br/>
<br/>
In my opinion this could provide interesting best practice propagation for novices like me.
<br/>
<br/>
Thanks,
<br/>
Thomas
<br/>
_______________________________________________
<br/>
forge-dev mailing list
<br/>
<a href="http://javascript:parent.fastEmail('forge-dev@lists.jboss.org');" mce_href="javascript:parent.fastEmail('forge-dev@lists.jboss.org');" mce="mce" target="_blank">forge-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<br/>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev" mce="mce" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev</a>
<br/>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br/>
<br clear="all"/>
<div>
<br/>
</div>
--
<br/>
****************************************
<br/>
<a href="http://www.lucamasini.net" mce="mce" target="_blank">http://www.lucamasini.net</a>
<br/>
<a href="http://twitter.com/lmasini" mce="mce" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/lmasini</a>
<br/>
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9" mce="mce" target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9</a>
<br/>
****************************************
<br/>
</div>
</blockquote>
</forge-dev>
</luca.masini.mailing.list>
</body>
</html>