<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Guys, <div><br></div><div>I've had an 1h long chat with this guys Sunimal and he made a very good impression to both myself and Galder as being a sharp and committed person. I personally feel that it's very unfair for his effort and involvement to be rated the way it is. So would it be possible for the author of the evaluation to ping me offline to have a chat on that?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Mircea</div><div><br></div><div><div>On 12 Apr 2012, at 12:08, Mircea Markus wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I've been reviewing some infinispan submissions to GSoC and two[1][2] of them are rated with the minimal score (1/5). </div><div>I'm very surprised by that rating, especially in the case of [1] which is a solid submission with a good level of detail.</div><div>I know the rating is anonymous, but I'd really appreciate some details on why both submissions were rated like that.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Mircea</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/sunimalr/1">http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/sunimalr/1</a></div><div>[2] <a href="http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/anton_kovalyov/1">http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2012/anton_kovalyov/1</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>