[Hawkular-dev] Moving Nest and Bus to Hawkular Commons git repository

Peter Palaga ppalaga at redhat.com
Fri Dec 4 05:20:30 EST 2015


FYI, I released Bus 0.8.0.Final before starting to move it. -- P

On 2015-12-04 09:37, Peter Palaga wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> this was already discussed on several calls. Although I know of no
> objections, I am putting it also here to give you all the last chance to
> protest or discuss.
>
> The plan is to move the Maven modules from Nest [1] and Bus [2] git
> repositories to Commons repository [3].
>
> Details:
> * Nest and Bus Maven modules will be moved to Hawkular Commons git
>     repository
> * Nest and Bus Maven modules will belong to groupId org.hawkular.commons
> * All modules of the org.hawkular.commons incl. Nest and Bus will be
>     released together
> * The new and old subcomponents of Commons (such as Nest, Bus,
>     Templates, c* driver, ...) will be allowed to depend on each other,
>     but clearly, they may not introduce circular dependencies.
> * To help to keep control on which subcomponent depends on which other
>     subcomponents, the dependency management will happen on
>     the subcomponent level rather than in hawkular-commons-parent
>
> * Components consuming Nest, Bus or any of the other subcomponents of
>     Hawkular Commons will have to declare just one version property
>     version.org.hawkular.commons to manage all the the artifacts they
>     need from commons
>
> * As noted by Stefan, only such subcomponents should be allowed to be
>     hosted in Commons that are generic enough -i.e. that do not contain
>     any deep and specific domain knowledge. Move of Bus and Nest to
>     commons satisfies this.
>
> Pros:
> * Decrease the maintenance overhead by decreasing the number of git
>     repositories and by decreasing the number of Hawkular components
>     having independent release cycles - e.g. after a new release of
>     Hawkular Parent there is two component less to upgrade, two componets
>     less to release and n components less to upgrade that depend on Bus
>     and Nest
>
> Cons:
> * Loose some amount of design cleanness - Hawkular Commons hosts Maven
>     modules with clean logical borders that could be hosted and released
>     independently.
> * Esp. the independent release cycle could be seen as an
>     advantage when fixing bugs and CVEs
>
> Pseudo-con:
> * Note that the new home of Nest and Bus does not prescribe any
>     component that consumed Commons so far to consume also Nest and Bus
>     from now on. Dependent components can still choose the artifacts to
>     depend on with an unchanged granularity: Who dependeded on embedded
>     c* so far can stay with it without depending on Bus or Nest.
>
> I am going to work on this change now.
>
> [1] https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-nest
> [2] https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-bus
> [3] https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-commons
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>



More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list