[Hawkular-dev] httpclient vs okhhttp vs other

[Michael Burman]

HttpAsyncClient should not be used, it hasn't been updated after 2011 
and uses a very old version of HttpClient.

   -  Micke

On 04.02.2015 12:33, Thomas Segismont wrote:
> +1 for Apache Http Client and Async Http client.
>
> It's just a BOM managed dependency declaration. It doesn't mean that we
> can't use something if there's a good reason to do so (it does mean we
> won't use 5 different versions of the tool).
>
>
> Le 03/02/2015 16:44, Heiko Braun a écrit :
>>
>> +1 for apache http client
>>
>>
>>> On 03 Feb 2015, at 16:24, Juraci Paixão Kröhling
>>> <jpkroehling at redhat.com <mailto:jpkroehling at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm for a mature library.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev