[Hawkular-dev] Cassandra & Titan
Lukas Krejci
lkrejci at redhat.com
Thu Feb 5 04:49:33 EST 2015
Well, using blueprints or not (or maybe we should start looking at tinkerpop3
which merges blueprints, gremlin and all other tinkerpop projects into 1 lib),
the main advantage of using Titan is the shared storage with metrics.
I am a little bit afraid of committing to using something that will quite
likely just slowly die.
On Wednesday, February 04, 2015 12:46:37 Jiri Kremser wrote:
> Hi,
> In my opinion we can still use the Blueprints API, because there are
> numerous implementations out there
>
> https://github.com/tinkerpop/blueprints/wiki
>
> including neo4j (gpl), Mongo, OrientDB and possibly jdbc as a fallback (or
> even start for mvp). If we pick something Blueprints compliant, we get the
> bunch of graph algorithms for free:
>
> https://github.com/tinkerpop/furnace/wiki
>
> To be clear, titan will be still open-source, but without core developers, I
> guess, they will give it to the apache incubator.
>
>
> more info about the situation here:
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/aureliusgraphs/WtU6om8CtqI
> and here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/aureliusgraphs/c07WEdH-epY
>
> jk
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
More information about the hawkular-dev
mailing list