[Hawkular-dev] Should Keycloak integration be optional?

Thomas Segismont tsegismo at redhat.com
Tue Jan 27 04:34:12 EST 2015


Le 26/01/2015 09:59, Thomas Heute a écrit :
> In terms of priority, we should focus on Hawkular (not just metrics)

Agreed

> with Keycloak support and having it optional is not the priority.

Some more context maybe. I asked the question during the hangout and 
here's why. The PR as-is makes it impossible:
* to start a development container without KC
* to run tests/integration tests without KC
* to install a metrics server without KC

 From my perspective, that's important enough to consider making it or 
optional or holding the merge to let us think more about the problem.




More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list