[Hawkular-dev] Should Keycloak integration be optional?
Thomas Segismont
tsegismo at redhat.com
Tue Jan 27 04:34:12 EST 2015
Le 26/01/2015 09:59, Thomas Heute a écrit :
> In terms of priority, we should focus on Hawkular (not just metrics)
Agreed
> with Keycloak support and having it optional is not the priority.
Some more context maybe. I asked the question during the hangout and
here's why. The PR as-is makes it impossible:
* to start a development container without KC
* to run tests/integration tests without KC
* to install a metrics server without KC
From my perspective, that's important enough to consider making it or
optional or holding the merge to let us think more about the problem.
More information about the hawkular-dev
mailing list