[Hawkular-dev] Apps list search

[Gabriel Cardoso]

Updated a JIRA with screenshots on how the search would look like.

Please comment at the JIRA: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HAWKULAR-127 <https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HAWKULAR-127>

Thank you,
Gabriel


> On Jun 30, 2015, at 6:35 PM, Thomas Heute <theute at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> For now we are looking for relatively simple filtering (rather than search).
> 
> On the app server list, I guess we would want to filter on status AND 
> hostname.
> 
> For instance, I may want to filter the whole list for all servers on 
> *.corp.redhat.com that are DOWN OR UNKNOWN
> 
> If we allow for a user "query language" should be easy to understand by 
> non hardcore developers, like in JIRA.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> On 06/30/2015 05:43 PM, Lukas Krejci wrote:
>> What kind of query language are we going to support here? How will it
>> represent (if at all) the graph nature of inventory entities (e.g. gimme all
>> resources of type EAP in the "test" environment which relate to data source DS
>> by relationship "uses")?
>> 
>> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 16:34:55 Gabriel Cardoso wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> I was assigned to design the search/filter component for the applications
>>> list and would like to bring some questions. I already got some
>>> requirements from Liz/Thomas.
>>> 
>>> My proposal would be to present a behaviour similar to what JIRA does. They
>>> have “dropdown” selectors to allow filtering + a search box (initially).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> For our context, the dropdowns would be to filter State (Up, Down etc.) and
>>> Type (EAP, Wildfly etc.). We probably don’t need the find input in the
>>> beginning, when we have not many options.
>>> Thomas brought this comment:
>>>> The input text should still be editable to do more filtering such as:
>>>> "(status=DOWN OR status=UNKNOWN) AND hostname ~ 'corp.redhat.com
>>>> <http://corp.redhat.com/>' " (To show all servers on *.corp.redhat.com
>>>> <http://corp.redhat.com/> that are down or unknown)
>>> JIRA also covers that, when clicking on Advanced, the dropdowns are hidden
>>> and everything goes inside the search input:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I like this approach because we offer something user-friendly and at the
>>> same time provide something more powerful for advanced users.
>>> 
>>> I would like to hear your feedback.
>>> @Inventory team, from what was presented, it is feasible to be implemented?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gabriel
>>> 
>>> Gabriel Cardoso
>>> UX designer @ Red Hat
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

Gabriel Cardoso
UX designer @ Red Hat



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20150701/78124223/attachment-0001.html