[Hawkular-dev] Public Hawkular Instances - Feedback Please

[Thomas Heute]

I sometimes use 18080 to quickly check progress and/or verify something 
quick, it's been helpful.

I haven't used 18090.

It seems that the availability of that service has not been great but 
improved, if it's on 99% of the time then we should keep one of them.

In parallel we need to work on hawkular.io which would be SaaS-like, 
with data persisted and easy to upgrade when we want to. I have the 
infrastructure (CPU/memory/disk) ready on public OS1 since last week, we 
still need to deploy Hawkular and make Hawkular support tenants.

Thomas

On 04/30/2015 10:33 PM, Matthew Mahoney wrote:
> Hawkular Community,
>
> The JON QE team is querying feedback regarding the availability &
> usefulness of the Public Hawkular Instances:
>
> http://209.132.178.218:18080   (Try it out - "kick the tires
> <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kick_the_tires>")
> http://209.132.178.218:18090   (On-demand build for Development /
> Integration usage)
>
>   * Are either of these instances being used, and if so for what purpose?
>
>   * What can we do to make these instances more usable / useful?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>