[Hawkular-dev] Downsizing the Nest deployments

Juraci Paixão Kröhling jpkroehling at redhat.com
Thu Feb 4 08:44:43 EST 2016


Agree :)

I was looking at the dependency:tree for the WARs generated inside 
hawkular/hawkular, so, I can do some cleaning there (pinger, rest-api, 
avail-creator).

- Juca.

On 04.02.2016 13:28, Peter Palaga wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> there is a couple of jars our war deployments could load from WF modules
> that are available either on a stock WF/EAP installation (apache
> commons.*, guava 18, ...) or that are our own (c* driver, guava 16).
>
> Technically, it would mean to mark those dependencies as provided and
> declare them as dependencies in jboss-deployment-structure.xml.
>
> The motivation is twofold:
>
> (1) Make clear that (if applicable) it is the container teams who is
> responsible for sustaining and productization of the jars.
>
> (2) Make the wars smaller - faster to build, faster to release/upload,
> faster to download, faster to deploy.
>
> Can anybody see a reason why we should not follow this strategy?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>


More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list