[Hawkular-dev] Any objections to using gitbooks?

Thomas Heute theute at redhat.com
Tue Jun 7 06:59:07 EDT 2016


So Hawkular APM will give it a try...

The Git repo is here:
   https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-apm-user-guide

And the published book will be here:
https://www.gitbook.com/book/hawkular/hawkular-apm-user-guide/welcome


PS: At least another project/product used it successfully it seems:
Keycloak / Red Hat SSO



On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Thomas Heute <theute at redhat.com> wrote:

> I mostly have concerns about having docs spread over multiple solutions.
> But if the plan is to move all to gitbook, it should be ok.
>
> Also we should still use AsciiDoc (I see that gitbook supports AscissDoc
> and Markdown)
>
> Thomas
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Wondering if gitbooks was ever considered for the documentation? Seems
>> ideal as we can version each book with the component(s) it relates to, and
>> users can download a pdf version for use offline.
>>
>> Was thinking about experimenting with it for the updated APM docs?
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> Regards
>> Gary
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160607/81393521/attachment.html 


More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list