[Hawkular-dev] What are your Authentication and Authorization needs?

[Jay Shaughnessy]

Yes, yes, we know it's far from perfect :) Just can't yet get the 
bandwidth to do that schema review...

On 5/10/2016 4:42 PM, John Sanda wrote:
>
>> On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:29 AM, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn at redhat.com 
>> <mailto:jshaughn at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Juca,  I think Lucas is correct, Alerts has the multi-tenancy model 
>> built in and so requires a tenantId on everything.   We already have 
>> a standalone distribution (for use outside of Hawkular) that drives 
>> off of the Hawkular-Tenant header, so I guess we would just continue 
>> to use that mechanism in all cases.  I guess that means we may drop 
>> the h-accounts dependency but I will discuss further with Lucas and 
>> we'll continue to monitor the accounts changes.
>>
>> Lucas, this may further drive the need for schema refactoring because 
>> if we only receive a single tenant on everything coming from MIQ, we 
>> will get very little data distribution.
>
> I’ve said it in the past and it’s worth mentioning again. Even with 
> multiple tenants, you should be partitioning by more than just tenant.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160511/aacd0d71/attachment-0001.html