[Hawkular-dev] BTM or not BTM, that is the question

[Thomas Heute]

I would favor a renaming to "Hawkular <Something>" if we had an idea for a
name that encapsulate the 3 notions... (I don't). I agree that BTM is
confusing now.

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> As discussed in the recent blog (and demo), Hawkular BTM now provides
> Application Performance Management (APM), Distributed Tracing (DT) and
> Business Transaction Management (BTM).
>
> The project was initially started to address the third area, hence being
> called BTM - however BTM requires the collection of the information used to
> provide APM and DT - and providing those other views on the information is
> useful to users.
>
> Due to the wider scope, just wondering whether the BTM name is now
> misleading. If a project component rename was considered a good idea, then
> now would probably be the best time to do it, before getting close to a
> stable 1.0 version?
>
> So two questions:
>
> 1) Is a component rename a good idea?
>
> 2) If so, any suggestions for a name, either some generic term that
> encapsulates APM, DT and BTM - or alternatively a completely unrelated name
> (but then it would not follow the pattern used by other Hawkular
> components).
>
>
> Regards
> Gary
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160527/ea551939/attachment.html