[Hawkular-dev] BTM or not BTM, that is the question

[Thomas Heute]

Hawkular APM seems good indeed (better than BTM)

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Gary Brown <gbrown at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > What about:
> >
> > Hawkular Application Analytics: hawkular-app-analytics (It's part of the
> APM)
> >
>
> The fact that it is part of the conceptual framework definition for APM,
> along with Business Transactions, makes a more compelling case to use APM :)
>
> I think it also means we could explore more of the analytics angle in the
> future. But if we were to use the analytics name in the project title, it
> would be as limiting/misleading as the BTM name has turned out to be.
>
> > Pavol
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Segismont < tsegismo at redhat.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2016-05-27 11:07 GMT+02:00 Gary Brown < gbrown at redhat.com > :
> >
> >
> > 1) Is a component rename a good idea?
> >
> > I believe so.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2) If so, any suggestions for a name, either some generic term that
> > encapsulates APM, DT and BTM - or alternatively a completely unrelated
> name
> > (but then it would not follow the pattern used by other Hawkular
> > components).
> >
> > To me Hawkular APM would be good (in long and short form)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > hawkular-dev mailing list
> > hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > hawkular-dev mailing list
> > hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160527/2c27b764/attachment.html