[Hawkular-dev] https://hub.docker.com/r/hawkular/*

[Josejulio Martinez Magana]

+1

I agree.
We should:
  Delete the old and unused images, those are confusing.
  Move images used in examples to hawkular-labs, and
  Put more effort into adding some descriptions to the maintained images,
e.g. a general description of what it does/have.

On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Jiri Kremser <jkremser at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>   the Dockerhub is the image registry that is enabled by default for
> dockerd. IMO, we can't support only our internal RH registries and ignore
> the dockerhub. This is what we deliver to the community. Less and less
> people are downloading zip files and installing stuff these days (or even
> using package managers). If I want to try tool/product/project X (where X
> can be prometheus, ) First thing that comes to my mind is to google for the
> docker image and some short code (like `docker run -e foo=bar org/image`)
> that I can copy&paste to the terminal and have everything set up correctly.
> We have nothing like that today and that was 1 of the reasons, why I
> started the hawkinit cli/tui tool.
>
> Currently we have dozens of images there that are obsolete or that were
> used for 1 particular use-case/demo. For instance the hawkular-metrics
> https://hub.docker.com/r/hawkular/hawkular-metrics/tags/ has the latest
> change before 2 years and contains bunch of images that have snapshot in
> the tag. If I am a newcomer trying to play with hawkular-metrics, I would
> run away quickly.
>
> The very first image is the https://hub.docker.com/r/hawkular/hawkular/
> which should be the "Hawkular", right? Last change is 1 year old and again,
> for the newcomers it's hard to explain the fact that it's the old version
> containing the old components, but it has the rich UI, while the new ones
> have no UI, but new components.
>
> Could you guys look and reply to this email if you want to preserve
> certain image?
> Currently these are 'maintained' and quite ok (I didn't go through all of
> them):
> * hawkular-services
> * hawkular-openshift-agent
> * wildfly-hawkular-javaagent
> * wildfly-hawkular-agent-domain
> * wildfly-hawkular-agent
> * hawkular-website
> * hawkular-grafana-datasource
> * hawkular-openshift-agent-example-jolokia-wildfly (despite the name,
> (name != description))
> ... the rest seems to be abbandoned or was created for some demo and it's
> a question if those images should be under the hawkular org, or if we
> shouldn't move them to something like hawkular-labs or hawkular-examples,
> or similar. I don't know.
>
> One note to the naming: we have quite a lot of different agents without
> any description or metadata in the image itself, what should I use and
> when? I know that, mazz knows that and probably couple of other guys know
> that, but people out there would have no idea.
>
> Perhaps it would be good to have also some thoughts from people that are
> relatively new in the team or work a lot with the d. images. Like Caina,
> Paul, Josejulio.
>
> wdyt, guys?
>
> jk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20170525/3110b1d4/attachment.html