<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <font face="Calibri">Yes, hawkster was meant as a joke with a nod to
      heapster, I am +1 to a series of 'Hawkular * Agent' namings.  
      Although, one more just for fun, hawkfeed!</font><br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/19/2016 4:06 AM, Joel Takvorian
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAJo5TFkDgqgXMEHLHCCtWEhcTgQRXORRW1Z4h6CX5kdDGuzNZw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Other cryptic names we won't use anyway:
        hawkenshift (sonority close to openshift), variant: Hawk'n Shift
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>But +1 for the desperately serious "Hawkular
          Kubernetes/OpenShift Agent" and renaming Hawkular Agent :)</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Heiko
          W.Rupp <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:hrupp@redhat.com" target="_blank">hrupp@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
              class="">On 19 Oct 2016, at 9:20, Thomas Heute wrote:<br>
              <br>
              &gt; Personally I would vote for:<br>
              &gt;    - Renaming the existing "Hawkular Agent" to
              "Hawkular WildFly Agent" and<br>
              &gt; reduce its scope to the embedded WF scenario (+
              remote for domains). Small<br>
              &gt; in scope == easier to maintain, document,
              understand...<br>
              &gt;    - Name this one "Hawkular Kubernetes Agent", or
              "Hawkular OpenShift<br>
              &gt; Agent" if it really depends on OpenShift (but I'm not
              sure<br>
              <br>
            </span>+1<br>
            <span class=""><br>
              &gt; PS: I don't think we need yet another cryptic name as
              GoHawk / Hawkulark<br>
              &gt; (and in theory requires legal implication)<br>
              <br>
            </span>The binary certainly needs one - but something like
            hawkagent<br>
            should be good enough here.<br>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
                hawkular-dev mailing list<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org">hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev"
                  rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev</a><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org">hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>