<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Gary Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gbrown@redhat.com" target="_blank">gbrown@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>The aim is to add a "Tracing" entry as a "stage 2", but wasn't sure whether this meant releasing a version of the website without it first, and then introduce it as a separate step?<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br><br></div><div>Stage 1 = cleanup. Stage 2 = adding things.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div>A general comment - perhaps we should drop the "Hawkular" part from each component - so then we simply have "Metrics", "Alerts" and "Tracing"?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Good suggestion about dropping Hawkular; I updated the PR.<br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Heiko Rupp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hrupp@redhat.com" target="_blank">hrupp@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hey,<br>
<span><br>
On 3 Jul 2017, at 23:42, Stefan Negrea wrote:<br>
<br>
> I waited about 2 weeks to allow enough time for feedback. There was a<br>
> good amount of initial discussion on the document mostly in the form<br>
> of proposals to enhance the initial plan. There were zero negative<br>
> comments and nobody opposed the plan.<br>
<br>
</span>I know I did not chime in on the document, so have no right<br>
to complain now :-)<br>
<br>
I think though that the removal of Hawkular Services is wrong.<br>
It may indeed at the moment only exist for that one consumer,<br>
which is ManageIQ, but not listing it is in my opinion also<br>
confusing. Instead of removing it, we should perhaps better<br>
educate visitors of the web site (in a graphical way?) how this<br>
relates to the other projects.<br>
Similar to Tracing. This is no longer Hawkular APM, so it is right<br>
not to list Hawkular APM, but so far Tracing folks are still under the<br>
Hawkular umbrella and the blog contains a lot of content about it.<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
hawkular-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/hawkular-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
hawkular-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org">hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>