[hibernate-dev] jpa api jar name

[Emmanuel Bernard]

If you guys like that. But you will be the ones answering the questions:
 - why is Hibernate not standard
 - why do I need an hibernate specific jar to use JPA 2
:)

On 14 déc. 2009, at 16:02, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:

> I like the idea of having 'hibernate' in the actual jar name as well. When you are
> building a project the dependencies are clear. But when you just look at an artifact
> like for example a war file it helps a lot if the jar file names are a little more descriptive.
> We also have hibernate-core and not jut core.
> 
> 
> --Hardy
> 
> 
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:36:19 -0300, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> 
>> When the user simply has the jar file "in hand".
>> 
>> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 15:30 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>> Since jpa-api is not a standard name, people will search
>>> javax.persistence and they will see the group is prefix.
>>> When is the artifactID not next to the groupId? I don't remember where
>>> that could happen in ivy or maven but I am no expert here.
>>> 
>>> On 14 déc. 2009, at 15:22, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>> 
>>> > I am thinking of users here.  Since there will be multiple jpa api
>>> > jars out there I liked the idea of the jar name itself encoding the
>>> > fact that this is the one from hibernate.  I think this is more user
>>> > friendly.  I hear what you are saying though about the ability to
>>> > bootstrap any/all providers.
>>> >
>>> > -- Sent from my Palm Prē
>>> >
>>> > steve at hibernate.org
>>> > http://hibernate.org
>>> > ____________________________________________________________________
>>> > Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I would use
>>> > org.hibernate.javax.persistence:jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> >
>>> > Because while there is code written by us, it's not specific to
>>> > Hibernate and can bootstrap all providers on the market.
>>> >
>>> > On 11 déc. 2009, at 22:24, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Of course that should be
>>> > >
>>> > org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.0-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> > >
>>> > > ;)
>>> > >
>>> > > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 14:59 -0600, Steve Ebersole wrote:
>>> > >> I think there is a consensus we need to rename our JPA api jar.
>>> > The
>>> > >> main concern is that we should be capturing the spec version in
>>> > the
>>> > >> artifact name but that the versioning should be its own thing
>>> > since
>>> > >> there is in fact Hibernate specific code in the classes that we
>>> > will
>>> > >> have need to maintain and release independently.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I propose the following naming:
>>> > >>
>>> > org.hibernate.javax.persistence:hibernate-jpa-2.1-api:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Unless I hear different options I will make this change this
>>> > weekend.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> At that time I will also publish a release of it as 1.0.0-CR-1
>>> > >>
>>> > > --
>>> > > Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
>>> > > Hibernate.org
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > hibernate-dev mailing list
>>> > > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>> >
>>> 
>>> 
>