[hibernate-dev] Needed for 4.0.0.CR5?
gbadner at redhat.com
Thu Oct 13 14:14:31 EDT 2011
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Marlow" <smarlow at redhat.com>
> To: "Gail Badner" <gbadner at redhat.com>
> Cc: hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 9:53:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [hibernate-dev] Needed for 4.0.0.CR5?
> On 10/12/2011 06:12 PM, Gail Badner wrote:
> > A couple of new issues were opened today that seem important enough
> > to consider for 4.0.0.CR5. Not sure there's any time left to do
> > this, but here they are:
> > HHH-6727 (serializing an EntityManager should include enough
> > information to later be unserialized with re-association to
> > existing EntityManagerFactory (even on a different machine/jvm
> > process))
> > https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-6727
> If this can be fixed in a non-disruptive fashion, it would be good to
> assign to 4.0.0.next. If we don't fix in 4.0.0.next, I would like to
> fix it soon after. At the very best, in a clustered environment or
> that passivates/activates the extended persistence context, extra
> will be used by the duplicate EMF. Its not clear (to me), if the
> level entity/query cache is also duplicated. If the cache is
> (when serializing/unserializing an EntityManager), I would like to
I've made the fix version 4.0.0.next. Let's discuss on #hibernate-dev.
> > HHH-6726 (Oracle : map TextType to clob and ImageType to blob)
> > https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/HHH-6726
> > There have been a number of issues opened since the change was made
> > to map TextType (LONGVARCHAR) 'long' and ImageType (LONGVARBINARY)
> > to 'long raw'. This change was already documented in the migration
> > notes. Should the mapping for Oracle (only) be changed back to
> > clob and blob?
> > Steve, if you have a chance, please take a look at: HHH-6723
> > (Remove extra join from eager @OneToOne). I created a pull request
> > at: https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-core/pull/184. If
> > possible, I'd like to restore the performance improvement of
> > HHH-5109 for 3.6.8 and 4.0.0.CR5.
> > Please let me know if I should look at any of this for CR5. I'll
> > look into the Infinispan failure until I hear otherwise.
> > Thanks,
> > Gail
> > _______________________________________________
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
More information about the hibernate-dev