[hibernate-dev] Forum changes proposal

[Steve Ebersole]

FYI...
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/312708/stackoverflow-teams-sign-up


On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:07 PM Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:

> I just sent the request.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:26 PM Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 10 December 2015 at 17:48, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:43 AM Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 10 December 2015 at 15:24, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> > BTW, there is already a hibernate-users mailing list hosted on the
>> JBoss
>> >> > Mailman instance.  Back when we moved to JBoss Mailman they used to
>> set
>> >> > up a
>> >> > number of lists by default.  We just chose to not really use this
>> one in
>> >> > particular.  We could use this one for purpose discussed here.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, that would be nice. I'm registered on that list, and there have
>> >> been questions already although they are extremely rare - I recall
>> >> something like 3 a year? - probably because I don't think its
>> >> existance was ever advertised.
>> >
>> >
>> > Not sure.  Mailman is not great at showing "list statistics".  Actually
>> it
>> > kind of sucks as an archive (not searchable, segmented, etc).
>> >
>> > http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hibernate-users/
>> >
>> >
>> >> > BTW, I looked into creating a Hibernate SO Team.  Are we thinking one
>> >> > team?
>> >> > Or one per project (ORM, OGM, etc)?
>> >>
>> >> Depends on how it works? I do monitor various tags, including
>> >> "hibernate", "hibernate-search", "hibernate-ogm" and sometimes do a
>> >> cross-check query like "hibernate" + "lucene", although others on our
>> >> team often arrive first to answer.
>> >>
>> >> If the intent of the feature is to distribute the load among people to
>> >> answer and monitor such tags, then I guess you're not interested in
>> >> being notified for the Lucene related ones?
>> >>
>> >> From what I understand here:
>> >>  -
>> >>
>> http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/307513/the-power-of-teams-a-proposed-expansion-of-stack-overflow
>> >>
>> >> It looks like it's more about showing off our affiliation, and to
>> >> create a space were people can ask questions "about the team".
>> >> So I'd say a single team unless I misunderstood things.
>> >
>> >
>> > That would be my vote as well: one team
>>
>> Let's start with one then!
>> If future features warrant a more fine-grained approach for some
>> practicality reasons, we'll consider making sub-groups as an addition,
>> but I guess in terms of community it makes sense to build up a single
>> strong brand.
>>
>> Will you set it up?
>>
>