[hibernate-dev] javax.money

[Gunnar Morling]

> yes we could use an optional/provided dependency, but
> that would not be "proper".

That would actually be my preference; If the javax.money types are
present, enable the required Types etc. otherwise not. It's a pattern
we e.g. use in Validator, too, where we provide additional constraint
validator types based on what's available in the runtime environment.

Why do you consider it as not proper?


2015-12-22 17:03 GMT+01:00 Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>:
> I had planned to support this JSR when I thought it would be part of the
> JDK.  But as it is, supporting this properly would mean a whole new
> module/artifact just to add these few types + the dependency (similar to
> hibernate-java8).  I am not a fan of the fact that it would require a
> separate dependency; yes we could use an optional/provided dependency, but
> that would not be "proper".
>
> I am interested in what others think.
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, 1:37 PM Petar Tahchiev <paranoiabla at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I've been playing lately with JSR 354 javax.money api (
>> http://javamoney.java.net) and I was wondering if there's any plans for
>> hibernate to support this.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Petar!
>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>> ---
>> Public PGP Key at:
>> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x19658550C3110611
>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF  55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev