[hibernate-dev] [Hibernate ORM] Javadoc missing in Maven repositories

Sanne Grinovero sanne at hibernate.org
Mon Jan 16 13:53:42 EST 2017


On 16 January 2017 at 18:49, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> I think we are all saying that we personally find it far more useful to have
> the sources (which have the Javadoc btw ;) available in the IDE compared to
> having just the Javadoc.

I definitely agree but it's not an exclusive either/or ;)

> It's not a question of easy to generate/publish, it's a question of what is
> useful.  If someone finds it useful they can certainly submit a PR

Cool, that's what I'll tell them then.

Thanks

>
> And btw I use IntelliJ which has had this forever.  I have used it in the
> past and as I have stated I find it less useful than having the sources
> available.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017, 10:25 AM Sanne Grinovero <sanne at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure if the agreement is in wanting to keep the status quo, or
>> if it's simply not worth our time to chase such things. In other
>> words: may I suggest to such users that we'd accept a pull request, or
>> you'd rather not waste bandwidth during releases?
>>
>> Either way is fine by me, but I wonder if users from other IDEs and
>> tools are getting left in the dark for something which we'd have a
>> script do.
>>
>> On 16 January 2017 at 15:55, andrea boriero <andrea at hibernate.org> wrote:
>> > I agree with Steve and Gunnar.
>> >
>> > On 16 January 2017 at 15:41, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 The source JARs are the important thing here.
>> >>
>> >> Just tried out the JavaDoc view in Eclipse for the first time as
>> >> you're mentioning it. Can't say I find it overly useful nor that I've
>> >> been missing it for all these years :)
>> >>
>> >> 2017-01-16 15:43 GMT+01:00 Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org>:
>> >> > I personally think that publishing Javadocs per artifact is silly so
>> >> > I do
>> >> > not do it for ORM.  Its a limiting view.  We already publish an
>> >> > "aggregated" Javadoc that (again imo) is far better.  As you point
>> >> > out
>> >> > Sanne, we do publish sources to repo which at the IDE level is MUCH
>> >> better
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:28 AM Guillaume Smet
>> >> > <guillaume.smet at gmail.com
>> >> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's an issue we have for several of our projects (ie also on NoORM
>> >> >> projects), namely those building the javadoc in an aggregated task
>> >> >> at
>> >> the
>> >> >> end of the build.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It bugged me a little at first but as Eclipse defaults to using
>> >> >> source
>> >> >> anyway, I didn't care that much about this. It might be a good idea
>> >> >> to
>> >> fix
>> >> >> it if it does change something for our users.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Guillaume
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Sanne Grinovero
>> >> >> <sanne at hibernate.org>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >> > I noticed some people [1] asking why we don't deploy the javadoc
>> >> >> > jarfile in Maven repositories.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > That's very helpful for IDE integrations; I never noticed - nor am
>> >> >> > I
>> >> >> > sure how to verify - as my IDE falls back to using the sources.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Knowing how reliable Maven Central's directory listing are, I'm
>> >> >> > not
>> >> >> > even sure how to double check if this is true or at which level
>> >> >> > things
>> >> >> > might have gone wrong :)
>> >> >> > So I didn't open a JIRA yet. Someone more familiar with the ORM
>> >> >> > build
>> >> >> > could double check and take ownership of this please?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> > Sanne
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1 - https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/MavenGettingStarted-
>> >> >> > Users?et=watches.email.document_comment#comment-16211
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>> >> >> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> >> >> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>> >> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> >> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > hibernate-dev mailing list
>> > hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> hibernate-dev mailing list
>> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list