[hibernate-dev] 6.0 Alpha1 prep

Sanne Grinovero sanne at hibernate.org
Wed Dec 5 16:49:03 EST 2018


On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 20:10, Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> Another one..
>
> `hibernate-orm-modules` defines a `hibernate-envers` module (in the WF
> modules sense).  Since envers is now part of `hibernate-core` should we
> remove that module or have it just act as an alias for the main orm module?

Removal is fine. The `hibernate-envers` dedicated module was just new,
it never made it in any WF release.

Also, when it comes to WF modules, the WF team can easily add
additional backwards compatibility aliases - that's in their control.

>
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:54 AM Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> > One other artifact note...
> >
> > `hibernate-envers` has been merged into `hibernate-core` as of 6.  Should
> > we just drop this one since this is a new major release?  Or do the
> > relocation for a few?
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 7:42 AM Steve Ebersole <steve at hibernate.org> wrote:
> >
> >> As I am preparing the Alpha1 release a few topics of discussion have come
> >> up...
> >>
> >> Previously (last year's f2f) we had decided to unify the artifact naming
> >> conventions; specifically for ORM this meant renaming the groupId from
> >> `org.hibernate` to `org.hibernate.orm` as part of 6.0.  I wanted to see if
> >> everyone still agrees with this.
> >>
> >> There are a few artifacts we need to decide how to handle:
> >>
> >>    - `hibernate-entitymanager` and `hibernate-java8` have been part of
> >>    `hibernate-core` since 5.2 (I thought moving `hibernate-entitymanager`
> >>    happened way earlier, but seems like not).  Should we drop these?  They
> >>    have been defined as relocations for quite some time now).
> >>    - `hibernate-ehcache` defines support for using Ehcache 2 as a
> >>    second-level cache, which is a version the Ehcache team does not even
> >>    support anymore and have not for quite a few years.  Ehcache 3 is a JCache
> >>    compliant version and the way that the Ehcache team prefer to handle the
> >>    integration (in fact they wrote most of `hibernate-jcache`).  IMO this
> >>    should be removed as well.  Thoughts?
> >>    - `hibernate-infinispan` - support for using Infinispan as a
> >>    Hibernate L2C has been moved to the Infinispan project. Again, IMO this
> >>    module should go away.  Thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >> Andrea, Chris.. anything you can think of that I missed?
> >>
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


More information about the hibernate-dev mailing list