[infinispan-dev] Implicit locking

Vladimir Blagojevic vblagoje at redhat.com
Tue May 26 02:41:41 EDT 2009


On 5/25/09 10:49 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>
>> Not so much. It is easier to do it from TxInterceptor I think. In 
>> overridden enlistWriteAndInvokeNext we create LCC instances and pass 
>> the along the chain. We will slightly change 
>> LockIterceptor#visitLockControlCommand to handle these specific cases 
>> - not so hard.
>
> Ok
Hmmm, what about DistTxInterceptor? Do I need to create two subclasses 
one for regular replication setup and another for dist?



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list