[infinispan-dev] Making confusion between different remove() APIs

Manik Surtani manik at jboss.org
Tue Nov 3 18:43:40 EST 2009


FYI, captured in ISPN-251

Sent from my iPhone

On 3 Nov 2009, at 19:16, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org>  
wrote:

>
> On 3 nov. 09, at 19:03, Galder Zamarreno wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/03/2009 05:37 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> On 3 Nov 2009, at 16:31, Emmanuel Bernard<emmanuel at hibernate.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Another option is to use a fluent API
>>>> blah.usingContext().flags(FOO,BAR).remove();
>>>
>>> Hmm, that's a possibility. Maybe cache.withFlags(FOO,BAR).remove 
>>> (key)
>>> where withFlags() returns a Cache.
>>>
>>> Wdyt, guys?
>>
>> Interesting idea Emmanuel, seems like you're quite fond of fluent
>> APIs :)
>>
>> I'd stick with single word flags(), i.e.:
>>
>> cache.flags(FOO,BAR).remove(key)
>>
>> flags() looks explicit enough to me.
>
> The reason I use usingContext() is for future extensibility. I don't
> know your API well enough to know if that's necessary.
> Do you need both flags and hints for example?
> Do they apply for a single operation or many operations?
> In the latter case I would do
> Cache cache = CacheManager
>     .usingContext()
>        .flags(BOO)
>        .hints("faster")
>           .getCache();
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list