[infinispan-dev] Releasing 4.0.0.CR2

[Sanne Grinovero]

2009/11/9 Manik Surtani <msurtani at redhat.com>:
> I can't think of any tests that create CacheManagers in different threads and join the same group.  I guess this would be tricky in our parallelised test environment since the framework changes network IP and port ranges based on the thread running the test, so that tests running in parallel don't see/affect each other.
>
> Could this be your problem?  Does your problem occur in a test run in the Infinispan test suite?  To prove it perhaps you could write a standalone test or class if this is the case.
>
> Cheers
> Manik

I'm having these problems even when running my test alone, and I am
not extending other tests, so I don't think it's interacting with
other caches. I also killed every other java process :-/
Will try again soon, and show you the code if it fails again. Thanks
for your support!

Sanne


>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sanne Grinovero" <sanne.grinovero at gmail.com>
> To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Monday, 9 November, 2009 12:39:15 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal
> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Releasing 4.0.0.CR2
>
> Hi Manik,
> I've been able to fix the things I wanted to change in the Lucene
> directory, but the new tests I produced revealed some other problem,
> basically it looks like I can't join a new cache on an existing group.
> Still looking into that, I am suspecting it might have something to do
> with my environment (thread number limitations/network security). I am
> setting up a dev environment on another pc and cleaning up my laptop
> to reproduce; hard to say if for Wednesday this will work fine.
>
> Could you point me to some core test creating new cachemanager
> instances in different threads? I'm particularly interested in new
> cachemanagers joining and being removed periodically; usually the
> cachemanagers are all created in a before-test phase (in same thread,
> quite fast one after the other).
>
> thanks,
> Sanne
>
> 2009/11/9 Manik Surtani <msurtani at redhat.com>:
>> Hello all.
>>
>> How does everyone feel about cutting 4.0.0.CR2 this week?  I think we have some important fixes in place:
>>
>>   http://tinyurl.com/ydb4ucd
>>
>> including an API one (yes, I know I hate myself for doing this so late) - ISPN-251
>>
>> Anyway, how do people feel about getting their open issues in by close of Wednesday?  What do people have pending?
>>
>> Noel - you reckon you could have the code part of ISPN-123 in place by then?
>>
>> Sanne - what's the state of the Lucene dir provider?
>>
>> Vladimir - I don't think ISPN-245 has any impact on this release since it is an internal API and not used at the moment anyway, although if it is in place it would be good to change the Query module to use it - a good showcase.
>>
>> Galder/Mircea - anything else pending?  Galder let's chat re: ISPN-259 on IRC.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Manik
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev