[infinispan-dev] Do we need bulk eviction notification?
"이희승 (Trustin Lee)"
trustin at gmail.com
Thu Oct 14 07:20:15 EDT 2010
Current BoundedConcurrentHashMap notifies EvictionListener for every
evicted entry. However, as you see from
BoundedConcurrentHashMap.Segment.attemptEviction(..), eviction often
happens in bulk.
If these evicted entries are supposed to be passivated, it is often
beneficial to begin a transaction because it often takes much less time
to call commit() less often. If N entries are evicted:
without bulk eviction:
store.store(e1); -- each store implied a commit()
store.store(..);
store.store(eN);
with bulk eviction:
store.begin(mods(e1, ..., eN), tx, true);
so, what do you think about changing the EvictionListener interface like
this:
interface EvictionListener<K, V> {
void preEvict(K key);
void postEvict(K key, V value);
void preBulkEvict(Set<K> keys);
void postBulkEvict(Map<K, V> entries);
}
abstract class AbstractEvictionListener<K, V>
implements EvictionListener {
void preBulkEvict(Set<K> keys) {
for (K k: keys) { preEvict(k); }
}
void postBulkEvict(Set<K> keys) {
...
}
}
I might be missing something though. Please let me know if there is a
way to achieve similar improvement without this modification.
--
Trustin Lee - http://gleamynode.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 290 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20101014/69932409/attachment.bin
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list