[infinispan-dev] batching API and DummyTM

Galder Zamarreño galder at redhat.com
Tue Sep 14 06:25:12 EDT 2010


On Sep 13, 2010, at 11:06 PM, Manik Surtani wrote:

> 
> On 13 Sep 2010, at 19:26, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> 
>> An important feature I'm missing when using batches but not using a
>> transaction manager is the capability to eagerly lock keys, because
>> there's no unlock.
> 
> This applies to regular JTA transactions as well as batching, correct?

As a side note, this goes back, slightly, to my original question on batching. 

Does batching (without a TM) make sense with eager locking? With JTA, we know locks are released at commit time thanks to multi node coordination.

However, does multi node coordination happen when batching without TM is used? If not, eager locking does not make sense with batching.

> 
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik at jboss.org
> Lead, Infinispan
> Lead, JBoss Cache
> http://www.infinispan.org
> http://www.jbosscache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

--
Galder Zamarreño
Sr. Software Engineer
Infinispan, JBoss Cache




More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list