[infinispan-dev] [ISPN-78] Feedback needed

Manik Surtani manik at jboss.org
Fri Apr 15 10:59:14 EDT 2011


On 13 Apr 2011, at 19:26, Mircea Markus wrote:

> IMO the large object methods would fit better in the Cache directly, vs AdvancedCache.

Perhaps a new interface?  StreamingCache?

> The way I see it AdvancedCache exposes to the power user internal ISPN stuff - stuff that's not generally needed by every day user. E.g. the interceptor chain, the rpc manager etc.
> Everything that is plain API should be on the Cache itself, including lock() and withFlags() methods.

Not really - I'd rather leave these as they are since they are considered advanced usage methods which require understanding of how Infinispan works internally.

--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org






More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list