[infinispan-dev] [ISPN-78] Feedback needed
Olaf Bergner
olaf.bergner at gmx.de
Fri Apr 15 12:53:37 EDT 2011
Am 15.04.11 17:01, schrieb Manik Surtani:
> On 10 Apr 2011, at 21:07, Olaf Bergner wrote:
>
>> Keep in mind that so far I have completely ignored the issue of
>> supporting transactions when reading and writing large objects. I would
>> prefer to have a working core implementation before tackling the more
>> complicated aspects.
>
> How do you maintain consistency without transactions? E.g., Concurrent readers and a writer?
>
> Concurrent writers isn't a problem since we don't support this, however we may be able to add some kind of concurrent write support if we consider the streams as append-only.
I never meant to actually *publish* large object support without
mechanisms ensuring consistency in place. Yet I would prefer to have
most of the other issues - what should the official API's first
iteration look like?, is the approach I've taken so far basically sane?
and so forth - sorted before moving on to the more complicated aspects.
So far, it took some time to get used to the code base and acquire
*some* knowledge about INFINISPAN's inner workings, but it hasn't been
exactly rocket science. Just a lot of work. Ensuring consistency,
however, won't probably be that easy. Especially since I only have a
very shallow understanding of INFINISPAN's transaction support's inner
workings.
> Cheers
> Manik
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik at jboss.org
> twitter.com/maniksurtani
>
> Lead, Infinispan
> http://www.infinispan.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
More information about the infinispan-dev
mailing list