[infinispan-dev] [ISPN-78] Feedback needed

Olaf Bergner olaf.bergner at gmx.de
Fri Apr 15 12:56:50 EDT 2011


Am 15.04.11 16:59, schrieb Manik Surtani:
> On 13 Apr 2011, at 19:26, Mircea Markus wrote:
>
>> IMO the large object methods would fit better in the Cache directly, vs AdvancedCache.
> Perhaps a new interface?  StreamingCache?
I do like this approach. It keeps closely related methods in one place 
and might help to mitigate uncontrolled growth of the Cache interface.

Cheers,
Olaf
>> The way I see it AdvancedCache exposes to the power user internal ISPN stuff - stuff that's not generally needed by every day user. E.g. the interceptor chain, the rpc manager etc.
>> Everything that is plain API should be on the Cache itself, including lock() and withFlags() methods.
> Not really - I'd rather leave these as they are since they are considered advanced usage methods which require understanding of how Infinispan works internally.
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik at jboss.org
> twitter.com/maniksurtani
>
> Lead, Infinispan
> http://www.infinispan.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list