[infinispan-dev] Some flags are incompatible with implicit transactions

Sanne Grinovero sanne at infinispan.org
Tue Dec 13 10:45:16 EST 2011


On 13 December 2011 15:04, Slorg1 <slorg1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess I will troll a little here but it seems to me that the
> implicit transactions are the issue.
>
> What Galder suggested does makes sense( that you would want a failure
> to put in the cache in some circumstances to have no incidence) but
> some times if too many things are telling something does not make
> sense and cannot be done right... maybe it just should not be (e.g.
> implicit transactions).
>
> I know you feel strongly about the implicit transactions.
> Food for thought, I patched my version not to have them and I can tell
> you it works great!

Interesting; couldn't you achieve the same disabling transactions?


More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list