[infinispan-dev] Some flags are incompatible with implicit transactions

[Manik Surtani]

On 14 Dec 2011, at 13:55, Galder Zamarreño wrote:

>>> 
>>> Yeah it's pointless to use locks if you have a single operation, but I
>>> might want to do more operations in a single transaction.. actually
>>> what's the point of using a transaction if I have only one operation?
>> WIthout transaction it is possible that the operation is only partially applied, i.e. on a subset of numOwners, resulting in inconsistent state.
> 
> Good point Mircea. You should definitely document that cos that's pretty much the sole reason to use implicit transactions, something users should know.


Yes, please make sure this makes it onto Confluence.

--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20111220/eaaf8e81/attachment.html