[infinispan-dev] [Pull Request] Modular Classloading Compatibility

[Thomas P. Fuller]

How about just using "as" and "using" instead of "asClass" and 
"usingClassloader"?

Consider something like the following which kind of looks like a dsl:

Foo f = cache.getAdvancedCache().as (Foo.class).using (classLoader).get (key);

T




________________________________
From: Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinovero at gmail.com>
To: infinispan -Dev List <infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Mon, 2 May, 2011 21:08:47
Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] [Pull Request] Modular Classloading Compatibility

2011/5/2 Manik Surtani <manik at jboss.org>:
>
> On 1 May 2011, at 13:38, Pete Muir wrote:
>
>>>> As in, user API?  That's a little intrusive... e.g., put(K, V, cl) ?
>>>
>>> Not for put, since you have the class, just get, and I was thinking
>>> something more like:
>>>
>>> Foo foo = getUsing(key, Foo.class)
>>
>> This would be a pretty useful addition to the API anyway to avoid user casts.
>
> Maybe as an "advanced" API, so as not to pollute the basic API?  A bit like:
>
> Foo f = cache.getAdvancedCache().asClass(Foo.class).get(key);

doesn't look much better than a cast, but is more cryptical :)

getting back to the classloader issue, what about:

Cache c = cacheManager.getCache( cacheName, classLoader );

or
Cache c = cacheManager.getCache( cacheName ).usingClassLoader(classLoader );

BTW if that's an issue on the API, maybe you should propose it to
JSR-107 as well ?

Sanne

_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20110502/6e6c9015/attachment.html