[infinispan-dev] mixing optimistic and explicit locking

[Manik Surtani]

On 8 Sep 2011, at 11:31, Sanne Grinovero wrote:

> Since it turns out quite often to explain "weird things" to users
> about batching that it is in fact just a DummyTransaction, maybe it
> should be better to remove the current batching API and have people
> deal explicitly with transactions (in all it's aspects from usage,
> expectations and configuration).

Yes, this becomes a separate subject I suppose.  Is there a need for a batching API at all, won't transactions be sufficient?

--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20110908/aa8ae3af/attachment.html