[infinispan-dev] LocalQueryInterceptor misunderstanding

Israel Lacerra israeldl at gmail.com
Mon Aug 13 07:36:35 EDT 2012


Just a little fix:

"indexing data in the node is responsible for the data"
* indexing data in the node responsible for the data
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Israel Lacerra <israeldl at gmail.com> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> I think there is a misunderstanding in the way that LocalQueryInterceptor
> works (or, at least, in my understanding). LocalQueryInterceptor indexes
> data from calls originated locally. That is different from indexing data in
> the node is responsible for the" data, and I think we expect
> LocalQueryInterceptor works like this, right?
>
> At least,in ISPN 200, we have this item:
> "Each node maintains local indexes for state it is responsible
> for (-Dinfinispan.query.indexLocalOnly=true)."
>
> What you think about this? Should I change LocalQueryInterceptor? Should I
> create another interceptor just for clustered queries work??
>
> cheers!
>
> Israel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120813/57a1ff54/attachment.html 


More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list