[infinispan-dev] looking again at AS7-3290 and Hibernate 4.0.1...

[Manik Surtani]

On 8 Feb 2012, at 10:27, Sanne Grinovero wrote:

> On 8 February 2012 04:14, Scott Marlow <smarlow at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 02/07/2012 10:25 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 7 February 2012 15:21, Scott Marlow<smarlow at redhat.com>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 02/07/2012 10:07 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>  I'm not that worried about OGM (unless someone wants double buffering
>>>>>>>  ;), its more about users wanting to package in different versions in
>>>>>>>  Hibernate (newer/older).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Even if someone wanted double buffering, OGM was already upgraded to
>>>>> use Hibernate 4, so this doesn't apply.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I think it depends on whether OGM will always work with the Hibernate
>>>> 4.x version that is used in AS 7.x.  If OGM moves forward (Hibernate
>>>> version wise) and starts requiring a different version than the one that
>>>> is static wired into the Infinispan module, the user might want multiple
>>>> Hibernate 4.x versions to be wired into the Infinispan module.  I'm not
>>>> sure but if Infinispan has multiple versions of Hibernate in its
>>>> classpath, that probably would interfere with the custom commands (I
>>>> would think).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Good point. It's unlikely for OGM to need a 2nd level cache, but this
>>> reasoning applies to Hibernate Search as well, for which we often
>>> depend on a newer version of Core than what is provided by the AS.
>> 
>> 
>> How hard would it be to allow a different way of passing the custom commands
>> in?  Would this be a short term change in the next few weeks or longer term?
> 
> Sorry I'm not sure I understood what you are proposing. How do you
> suggest it should work?
> --Sanne

Yes, please do elaborate… 

--
Manik Surtani
manik at jboss.org
twitter.com/maniksurtani

Lead, Infinispan
http://www.infinispan.org