[infinispan-dev] very interesting performance results

[Sanne Grinovero]

Very nice!
All my previous tests also confirm that there is a correlation between PUT
and GET performance, when one increases the other goes down.

These PUT operations are doing a GET as well, correct? I'd love to see such
graphs using SKIP_REMOTE_LOOKUP.
How long are you warming up the VM? As mentioned in the other thread, I've
discovered that even under high load it will take more than 15 minutes
before all of Infinispan's code is running in compiled mode.

Cheers,
Sanne


On 26 January 2012 17:58, Mircea Markus <mircea.markus at jboss.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As discussed on another thread, I've hacked the remote get to only go to a
> single node. The performance of put almost doubled, whilst the one of gets
> decreased by about 10 percent.
> The performance decrease for gets is understandable, but I can't really
> understand why the write got so very fast. The OOB thread pool is not
> shared between the writes and the reads...
> That makes me think that there might be a contention point between OOB and
> regular threads?
>
> Cheers,
> Mircea
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120126/61b842d5/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 32853 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120126/61b842d5/attachment-0002.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 38653 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20120126/61b842d5/attachment-0003.png