[infinispan-dev] Need help: ISPN-2143

[Sanne Grinovero]

That's correct. It does not affect only joiners though,  there are several
cases:

- first node starting but having existing data in some CacheStore
- node A does a put with new type,  existing node B then runs a query

Looks like the easy solution is to store the set of known types as an
entry,  but even assuming there are no classloader issues there are some
not so clear side effects,  such as statistics getting skewed and similar.
On Apr 11, 2013 8:24 PM, "Manik Surtani" <msurtani at redhat.com> wrote:

> I presume this is to deal with the case when a node joins the cluster
> (shared index), and someone does a SearchManager.getQuery() without passing
> in any types?  Is that correct?  If a type or more than one type is passed
> in to that method then you don't have this problem, right?
>
> - M
>
>
> On 11 Apr 2013, at 18:40, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at infinispan.org> wrote:
>
> > This issue has been assigned to me for long, but I'm unable to find
> > time to work on it soon. Still, it's quite an important one, quite
> > annoying it's still open.
> >
> > Any volunteer?
> >
> > Requires a bit of coding in the Query module, but is totally unrelated
> > to Lucene so anyone familiar with Infinispan could do it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sanne
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> --
> Manik Surtani
> manik at jboss.org
> twitter.com/maniksurtani
>
> Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
> http://red.ht/data-grid
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20130411/b9c79b7f/attachment.html