[infinispan-dev] Design session today

[Sanne Grinovero]

On 9 August 2013 12:39, Manik Surtani <msurtani at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 9 Aug 2013, at 12:06, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at infinispan.org> wrote:
>
>>>> 3. allowing the cache loader to expose unserialised data directly (ValueHolder.getBytes[]).
>>>
>>> I used the name ValueHolder but this is a really poor term - how about ContentsProxy?  It is a proxy for the contents of the entry, exposing methods:
>>>
>>> interface ContentsProxy {
>>>  ByteBuffer getValueBuffer();
>>>  ByteBuffer getInternalCacheValueBuffer();
>>>  InternalCacheValue getInternalCacheValue();
>>>
>>>  // Same as above except this method only deserializes timestamps and metadata.  Not the actual value.
>>>  InternalCacheValue getSparseInternalCacheValue();
>>> }
>>
>> +1 for the name "ContentsProxy".
>> On exposing ByteBuffer .. I'm wondering if we shouldn't have our own
>> interface, potentially shared with JGroups. For example, I'd like to
>> see an appendToEnd capability and an insertToHead which don't require
>> to eagerly resize the underlying arrays.
>
> https://docs.jboss.org/infinispan/5.2/apidocs/index.html?org/infinispan/io/ByteBuffer.html

Perfect :-)

Cheers,
Sanne

>
> --
> Manik Surtani
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev