[infinispan-dev] Cachestores performance

Radim Vansa rvansa at redhat.com
Thu Jul 4 09:30:09 EDT 2013



----- Original Message -----
| From: "Sanne Grinovero" <sanne at infinispan.org>
| To: "infinispan -Dev List" <infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
| Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 3:21:36 PM
| Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Cachestores performance
| 
| On 4 July 2013 13:56, Manik Surtani <msurtani at redhat.com> wrote:
| > Interesting and convoluted thread.  I'll try and summarise my thoughts on
| > one email:
| >
| > * I agree with Sanne that a cheat sheet will be extremely useful.  Sanne,
| > feel like kicking this off with your use case as described here, on the
| > wiki?  I like your ideas but just ranting about them won't help anybody.
| > ;) Maybe then others can follow your template for more use cases, such as
| > the one Erik has detailed.
| 
| +1 and sorry for the rant. But still even after all my whining nobody
| explained why we want to prioritise synchronous cachestore :-)
| My point is not being against doing it, but to identify eagerly what
| else is needed to accomodate such a use case: having the CacheStore
| implementation is not enough to make such a configuration usable.

There may not be any "we want to" - just my own preference (without proper thought, I admit). But I don't think that it has been *prioritized* beyond the several tests with sync (and there are results for non-sync as well) and my microbenchmark.

Radim


More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list