[infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler

[Alan Field]

Thanks, Bela and sorry for my confusing question!

Would you say that the bundler_type="new" is more performant than the bundler_type="old" in 3.2.7?

Thanks,
Alan

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bela Ban" <bban at redhat.com>
> To: infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:27:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler
> 
> In 3.2.7, bundler_type="new" is the default. This uses a bundler that's
> similar to the new bunder in 3.3.x (which actually started out as a copy
> of the 3.2.x bundler). The 3.3.x bundler is more efficient though
> 
> On 6/5/13 4:15 PM, Alan Field wrote:
> > Sorry, not sure where I was getting 2.7.x, I meant 3.2.x. (The version
> > included with Infinispan 5.2)
> >
> > Sorry,
> > Alan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Bela Ban" <bban at redhat.com>
> >> To: infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:11:34 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan 5.3 and the new JGroups bundler
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/5/13 3:51 PM, Alan Field wrote:
> >>> Hey Pedro,
> >>>
> >>>>> 1) What is the default bundler used in JGroups 2.7.x?
> >>>>
> >>>> Bela is the right person to answer this, but I think the new bundler was
> >>>> created only in JGroups 3.3.x.
> >>>
> >>> So what happens if the JGroups 2.7.x config file has
> >>> UDP.bundler_type="new"? Will it just be ignored?
> >>
> >> bundler_type doesn't exist in 2.7, so this will throw an exception and
> >> the stack won't be started
> 
> 
> --
> Bela Ban, JGroups lead (http://www.jgroups.org)
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>