[infinispan-dev] L1 Data Container

[Dan Berindei]

This would only affect the Cache internals (use two DataContainers instead
of one). Users still won't have direct access to the L1 cache.



On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:24 PM, cotton-ben
<ben.cotton at alumni.rutgers.edu>wrote:

>
> Instinctively, this is a very attractive idea.
>
> Would the L1 data container be a "separate, but equal" container?  i.e.
> would it be  a separate instance from the DIST_SYNC cache but the exact
> same
> data structure?
>
> or
>
> Would the L1 data container be "separate, and different" container?  i.e.
> would it be a completely different data structure (and API) from the
> DIST_SYNC cache?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://infinispan-developer-list.980875.n3.nabble.com/infinispan-dev-L1-Data-Container-tp4027447p4027449.html
> Sent from the Infinispan Developer List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20130619/a923f97f/attachment.html