[infinispan-dev] How to run the testsuite?

Galder Zamarreño galder at redhat.com
Thu Mar 21 07:35:10 EDT 2013


On Mar 20, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Adrian Nistor <anistor at redhat.com> wrote:

> I've also tried changing the fork mode of surefire from 'none' to 'once' and the entire suite runs fine now on jvm 1.6 with 500mb MaxPermSize.  Previously I did not complete, 500mb was not enough.
> Anyone knows why surefire was not allowed to fork?
> 
> Haven't tried to analyze closely the heap yet but first thing I noticed is 15% of it is occupied by 190000 ComponentMetadataRepo instances, which probably is not the root cause of this issue, but is odd anyway :).

If you have a heap dump, can you put it somewhere online so that we can inspect it? Eclipse MAT is great for that...

> 
> On 03/20/2013 05:12 PM, Dan Berindei wrote:
>> The problem is that we still leak threads in almost every module, and that means we keep a copy of the core classes (and all their dependencies) for every module. Of course, some modules' dependencies are already oversized, so keeping only one copy is already too much...
>> 
>> I admit I don't run the whole test suite too often either, but I recently changed the Cloudbees settings to get rid of the OOM there. It uses about 550MB of permgen by the end of the test suite, without -XX:+UseCompressedOops. These are the settings I used:
>> 
>> -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled   -XX:NewRatio=4 -Xss500k -Xms100m -Xmx900m -XX:MaxPermSize=700M
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Sanne, turn on CompressedOops ? Still those requirements are indeed
>> ridiculous.
>> 
>> Tristan
>> 
>> On 03/20/2013 01:27 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> > I'm testing master, at da5c3f0
>> >
>> > Just killed a run which was using
>> >
>> > java version "1.7.0_17"
>> > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_17-b02)
>> > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.7-b01, mixed mode)
>> >
>> > this time again an OOM (while I have 2GB !), last sign of life came
>> > from the "Rolling Upgrade Tooling"
>> >
>> > I'm not going to merge/review any pull request until this works.
>> >
>> > Sanne
>> >
>> > On 20 March 2013 12:09, Mircea Markus <mmarkus at redhat.com> wrote:
>> >> I've just run it on master and didn't get OOM. well I'm using osx. Are you running it on master or a particular branch? Which module crashes?
>> >> e.g. pedro's ISPN-2808 adds quite some threads to the party - that's the reason it hasn't been integrated yet.
>> >>
>> >> On 20 Mar 2013, at 11:40, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>> after reviewing some pull requests, I'm since a couple of days unable
>> >>> to run the testsuite; since Anna's fixes affect many modules I'm
>> >>> trying to run the testsuite of the whole project, as we should always
>> >>> do but I admit I haven't done it in a while because of the core module
>> >>> failures.
>> >>>
>> >>> So I run:
>> >>> $ mvn -fn clean install
>> >>>
>> >>> using -fn to have it continue after the core failures.
>> >>>
>> >>> First attempt gave me an OOM, was running with 1G heap.. I'm pretty
>> >>> sure this was good enough some months back.
>> >>>
>> >>> Second attempt slowed down like crazy, and I found a warning about
>> >>> having filled the code cache size, so doubled it to 200M.
>> >>>
>> >>> Third attempt: OutOfMemoryError: PermGen space! But I'm running with
>> >>> -XX:MaxPermSize=380M which should be plenty?
>> >>>
>> >>> This is :
>> >>> java version "1.6.0_43"
>> >>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_43-b01)
>> >>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.14-b01, mixed mode)
>> >>>
>> >>> MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx2G -XX:MaxPermSize=380M -XX:+TieredCompilation
>> >>> -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true -Djgroups.bind_addr=127.0.0.1
>> >>> -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=200M
>> >>> -Dlog4j.configuration=file:/opt/infinispan-log4j.xml
>> >>>
>> >>> My custom log configuration just disables trace & debug.
>> >>>
>> >>> Going to try now with larger PermGen and different JVMs but it looks
>> >>> quite bad.. any other suggestion?
>> >>> (I do have the security limits setup properly)
>> >>>
>> >>> Sanne
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> >>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> --
>> >> Mircea Markus
>> >> Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> >> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > infinispan-dev mailing list
>> > infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>> >
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> 
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


--
Galder Zamarreño
galder at redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz

Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io

Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org




More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list