[infinispan-dev] [Discussion] TimeService implementation

Sanne Grinovero sanne at infinispan.org
Fri May 3 07:58:49 EDT 2013


For testing purposes it would be useful to inject a custom
implementation. Doesn't have to be a public API, but some kind of
extension point would be needed.

On 3 May 2013 12:51, Mircea Markus <mmarkus at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 3 May 2013, at 11:46, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
>
>> On May 2, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Pedro Ruivo <pedro at infinispan.org> wrote:
>>
>>>>> When recovery is enabled, the recovery manager creates a second cache.
>>>>> Someone may want to replace the Clock/TimeService for the "normal" cache
>>>>> and left the default implementation in the "recovery" cache.
>>>>
>>>> ^ Why would an end-user want to replace the Clock/TimeService?
>>>>
>>>> Remember what I said in my previous email: I can see someone changing the service implementation for testing reasons, and in that case, a global clock/timer service that's swapable via system property would work just fine IMO.
>>>
>>> I don't know. I'm being pessimist and assuming that someone in the world
>>> as a dark use case and needs to replace the service.
>>
>> ^ We already have quite a big configuration… we should think twice about adding more stuff… :)
> +1. on top of that we can always add it to config if needed, harder to remove it.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Mircea Markus
> Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list