[infinispan-dev] still to do on HR-embedded integration in ISPN-2281

[Martin Gencur]

Hi,
so I gave it another try with latest Infinispan and Infinispan-server 
snapshots (HEAD: a901168, resp. bc432fa) . In short, the results are 
still the same for inVM mode but worse for client-server mode. Of 
course, I haven't changed anything in the test since last time.

This time, I left out the results for 1MB entries because there's high 
distortion due to the low number of entries stored in a cache (storing 
100MB of data). Previously, the results looked better for HotRod 
compared to the first round of tests I did for ISPN 5.2. Now the results 
for HotRod are worst of the three measurements, inVM mode remains the same:

HotRod (ISPN 5.2):
entry size -> overhead per entry
512B  -> 174B
1kB   -> 178B
10kB  -> 176B

HotRod (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT, a few weeks ago)
512B  -> 159 (~ -9%)
1kB   -> 159 (~ -11%)
10kB  -> 154 (this is perhaps affected by the low number of entries 
stored in mem.)

HotRod (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT, now)
512B  -> 191
1kB   -> 191 (measured twice)
10kB  -> 186 (looks a bit distorted already)

------------------------

Memcached (ISPN 5.2)
512B  -> 184
1kB   -> 181
10kB  -> 182

Memcached (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT)
512   -> 228
1kB   -> 227
10kB  -> 235

--------------------------------

REST (ISPN 5.2)
512B  -> 208
1kB   -> 205
10kB  -> 206

REST (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT)
512   -> 247
1kB   -> 247
10kB  -> 251

------------------------------------

inVM (ISPN 5.2)
512B  -> 151
1kB   -> 151
10kB  -> 155

inVM (ISPN 5.3-SNAPSHOT)
512   -> 150
1kB   -> 150
10kB  -> 150


Martin


Dne 23.5.2013 18:13, Mircea Markus napsal(a):
> Hi Martin,
>
> Galder has finalised the remaining bits of ISPN-2281. Is it possible for you to re-run the test to see where we are with the memory consumption?
>
> On 13 May 2013, at 10:44, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>> On May 7, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Manik Surtani <msurtani at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7 May 2013, at 15:39, Martin Gencur <mgencur at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can make a blog post once we have this for Memcached and REST. I guess it is not ready yet.
>>>> Yes please.  Nice work.  :)
> Cheers,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20130524/32a586f5/attachment.html