[infinispan-dev] Remote Hot Rod events wiki updated

Galder Zamarreño galder at redhat.com
Fri Apr 11 08:03:07 EDT 2014


On 03 Apr 2014, at 10:05, Dan Berindei <dan.berindei at gmail.com> wrote:

> Don't we want to allow the user to pass some data to the filter factory on registration?
> 
> Otherwise we'd force the user to write a separate filter factory class every time they want to track changes to a single key.

Possibly, I did consider passing some data from the client to the filter/converter factory objects, but could not think of a very clean solution. One option would be for the protocol to specify a vInt, indicating the number of parameters, and then each parameter as byte[] with its length prepended. A java hot rod client could marshall the parameters into byte[]. For the server side implementations, they could receive an Object[] as parameter in the callback with the unmarshalled versions.

> 
> Cheers
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I’ve finally managed to get around to updating the remote hot rod event design wiki [1].
>> 
>> The biggest changes are related to piggybacking on the cluster listeners functionality in order to for registration/deregistration of listeners and handling failure scenarios. This should simplify the actual implementation on the Hot Rod side.
>> 
>> Based on feedback, I’ve also changed some of the class names so that it’s clearer what’s client side and what’s server side.
>> 
>> A very important change is the fact that source id information has gone. This is primarily because near-cache like implementations cannot make assumptions on what to store in the near caches when the client invokes operations. Such implementations need to act purely on the events received.
>> 
>> Finally, a filter/converter plugging mechanism will be done via factory implementations, which provide more flexibility on the way filter/converter instances are created. This opens the possibility for filter/converter factory parameters to be added to the protocol and passed, after unmarshalling, to the factory callbacks (this is not included right now).
>> 
>> I hope to get started on this in the next few days, so feedback at this point is crucial to get a solid first release.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/wiki/Remote-Hot-Rod-Events
>> 
>> --
>> Galder Zamarreño
>> galder at redhat.com
>> twitter.com/galderz
>> 
>> Project Lead, Escalante
>> 
>> http://escalante.io
>> 
>> 
>> Engineer, Infinispan
>> 
>> http://infinispan.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> 
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


--
Galder Zamarreño
galder at redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz




More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list