[infinispan-dev] Store as binary

[Pedro Ruivo]

Hi,

IMO, we should try the worst scenario: Local Mode + Single thread.

this will show us the highest impact in performance.

Cheers,
Pedro

On 01/20/2014 09:41 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> Hi Radim,
>
> I think 4 nodes with numOwner=2 is too small of a cluster. My calculus here[1] points out that for numOwners=1, the performance benefits is only visible for clusters having more than two nodes. Following a similar logic for numOwenrs=2, the benefit would only be visible for clusters having more than 4 nodes. Would it be possible to run the test on a larger cluster, 8+ nodes?
>
> [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2009-October/004299.html
>
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mircea,
>>
>> I've ran a simple stress test [1] in dist mode with store as binary (not
>> enabled, enabled keys only, enabled values only, enabled both).
>> The difference is < 2 % (with storeAsBinary enabled fully being slower).
>>
>> Radim
>>
>> [1]
>> https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jdg-radargun-perf-store-as-binary/1/artifact/report/All_report.html
>>
>> --
>> Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com>
>> JBoss DataGrid QA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> Cheers,
>