[infinispan-dev] Dropping AtomicMap/FineGrainedAtomicMap

[Mircea Markus]

On Jan 20, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Dropping AtomicMap and FineGrainedAtomicMap was discussed last week in the F2F meeting [1]. It's complex and buggy, and we'd recommend people to use the Grouping API instead [2]. Grouping API would allow data to reside together, while the standard map API would apply per-key locking.
> 
> We don't have a timeline for this yet, but we want to get as much feedback on the topic as possible so that we can evaluate the options.

+1
There's been a good discussion on this topic: http://goo.gl/WNs6KY


> 
> Cheers,
> 
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3901
> [2] http://infinispan.org/docs/6.0.x/user_guide/user_guide.html#_the_grouping_api
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> galder at redhat.com
> twitter.com/galderz
> 
> Project Lead, Escalante
> http://escalante.io
> 
> Engineer, Infinispan
> http://infinispan.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Cheers,
-- 
Mircea Markus
Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)