[infinispan-dev] Testing a Hot Rod client app, with smart routing disabled?

[Tristan Tarrant]

Yes, it means the client is not topology aware either.

Tristan

On 19/09/16 15:19, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> On 19 September 2016 at 13:52, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Currently thee Java client always sets the client intelligence header to
>> 3 (topo +  ch aware). We could add a configuration property so that you
>> could specify 1 (basic).
>> The alternative requires playing with the transport and playing with the
>> "failed servers" but that is messy !
> I'd also need the client to not "autodiscover" the nodes I didn't
> explicitly list.
> Would setting a "1" in this intelligence header be enough for that?
>
> Thanks!
> Sanne
>
>
>> Tristan
>>
>> On 19/09/16 13:39, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm testing a concurrent update protocol based on Hot Rod client's
>>> support for versioned entries.
>>>
>>> I would love to be able to write a test having multiple client
>>> endpoints, each connecting to a specific server. Of course HR's "smart
>>> routing" prevents me from controlling this explicitly.. is there a way
>>> to control it?
>>>
>>> For example having servers {A, B} connected in cluster I'd like to
>>> create two clients {A', B}', each one connected exclusively to one of
>>> them and not aware of the other server node. (A <-> A', B <-> B').
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sanne
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>