[infinispan-dev] Proto file for indexed and non-indexed use case?

[Adrian Nistor]

yes!

On 04/04/2017 03:48 PM, Galder Zamarreño wrote:
> The cache for the second use case is already non-indexed. Is that enough to make sure the annotations are ignored?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> Infinispan, Red Hat
>
>> On 3 Apr 2017, at 18:58, Sanne Grinovero <sanne at infinispan.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Galder,
>>
>> did you consider using a non-indexed cache for the second case?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sanne
>>
>>
>> On 3 April 2017 at 16:44, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>
>>> I had a question regarding proto files. I have a single domain of objects that I want to use for two different use cases.
>>>
>>> In the first use case, I want the proto files to be indexed so I define the comments and related @Indexed/@Field...etc annotations.
>>>
>>> In the second use case, I'm merely using proto files as way to achieve compatibility mode, and I don't want any indexing to be done at all (cache is distributed with only compatibility and protostream marshaller enabled).
>>>
>>> Do I need a separate .proto file for this second use case where I remove the commented sections that enable indexing? Or can I use the one for the first use case? I really want to avoid any indexing happening in the second use case since it'd slow down things for no reason.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> --
>>> Galder Zamarreño
>>> Infinispan, Red Hat
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev